The 5-Second Trick For thesis delay application.case laws in pakistan
The 5-Second Trick For thesis delay application.case laws in pakistan
Blog Article
In case the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is usually only performed When the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence along with the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as a result they were very well aware about the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Case law is specific for the jurisdiction in which it had been rendered. By way of example, a ruling within a California appellate court would not normally be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
fourteen. During the light of your position explained higher than, it can be concluded that a civil servant incorporates a fundamental right being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be viewed as for no fault of his very own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency during the size of service or within the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some size, both parties have agreed into the disposal of the moment petition over the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner along with private respondents and will take care of all of the facets of the case and ensure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it demands legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be generated and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution outdoors traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as a vital alternative for resolving commercial conflicts swiftly and competently.
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation features the names of your parties to the first case, the court in which the case was heard, the date it was decided, as well as book in which it is recorded. Different citation requirements may include things like italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling within the same sort of case.
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court read more intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by regulation." It's very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Individuals remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of in the terms stated above. However no harassment shall be caused to either party and the case shall be decided because of the competent court of regulation if pending. Read more
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information for being gathered through the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
Because of their position between the two main systems of legislation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as mixed systems of legislation.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It is additionally a nicely-proven proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is issue towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.